Understanding Motives of Indigenous Cattle Farmers Joining Farmers Group in Brebes Regency, Indonesia


Yusmi Nur Wakhidati
Oentoeng Edy Djatmiko
Syarifuddin Nur
Dyah Gandasari


The development of Jawa Brebes (Jabres) cattle as indigenous cattle in Brebes Regency, Indonesia, is carried out using a farmer group approach. Cattle farmers join farmer groups with various motives and purposes. Understanding the motives of indigenous cattle farmers joining farmers group in Brebes Regency, Indonesia, this study aimed to identify the motives of Jabres cattle farmers to join the group and analyze the influencing factors of different motives to join farmers group. The study used a survey method to 119 Jabres cattle farmers in Brebes Regency. Respondents were selected using multistage sampling. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics to depict the cattle farmers' characteristics and identify their motives to join the farmers' group. Discriminant analysis identified the influencing factors of Jabres cattle farmers' different reasons for joining the Jabres cattle farmers group. The majority of the Jabres cattle farmers in Brebes Regency (75.6 percent) entered the farmers' group due to social motive and expectancy to feel secure in social interactions with other farmers. Farmer's education is an essential factor that causes differences in cattle farmers' motives in joining farmer groups (P <0.05). Cattle farmers with higher education join the farmers’ group to gain additional knowledge and realize beef cattle business goals (profitability and marketing).


How to Cite
Sugiarto, M., Wakhidati, Y. N., Djatmiko, O. E., Nur, S., & Gandasari, D. (2021). Understanding Motives of Indigenous Cattle Farmers Joining Farmers Group in Brebes Regency, Indonesia. ANIMAL PRODUCTION, 23(2), 120-126. https://doi.org/10.20884/1.jap.2021.23.2.83


Abdullah, A., M. Jamila, A. Amidah, A. Aslina, and S. Nurlaelah. 2019. The role of farmer group on development of beef cattle business. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 247. doi:10.1088/1755-1315/247/1/012040.
Alimirzaei, E., and A. Asady. 2011. Individual factors affecting farmers’ motivation to participate in date growers’ organizations in Khuzestan. Res. J. Appl. Sci. Eng. Technol. 3:725–730.
Andaleeb, N., M. Khan, S. A. Shah, and R. Ullah. 2019. Determinants of livestock farm household’s welfare with main focus on women’s involvement in livestock production in rural areas of District Mardan Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan. Sarhad J. Agric. 35:43–47. doi:10.17582/journal.sja/2019/
Baber, R., Y. Upadhyay, and R. P. S. Kaurav. 2017. Individuals’ Motivation for Joining a Social Group: Examining Their Homogeneity. Asia-Pacific J. Manag. Res. Innov. 13:43–51. doi:10.1177/2319510x18760616.
Bettencourt, E. M. V., M. Tilman, V. Narciso, M. L. da Silva Carvalho, and P. D. de Sousa Henriques. 2015. The livestock roles in the wellbeing of rural communities of Timor-Leste. Rev. Econ. e Sociol. Rural. 53:S063–S080. doi:10.1590/1234-56781806-94790053s01005.
De Dreu, C. K. W., L. R. Weingart, and S. Kwon. 2000. Influence of social motives on integrative negotiation: A meta-analytic review and test of two theories. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 78:889–905. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.78.5.889.
Guntoro, B., Y. Y. Suranindyah, A. A. Suryanto, and Y. Opatpatanakit. 2016. Farmers’ Motives in Raising Ettawa Crossbred Goat in Yogyakarta, Indonesia. Int. Bus. Manag. 10:2706–2712.
Hansson, H., R. Ferguson, C. Olofsson, and L. Rantamäki-Lahtinen. 2013. Farmers’ motives for diversifying their farm business - The influence of family. J. Rural Stud. 32:240–250. doi:10.1016/j.jrurstud.2013.07.002.
Harizanova-metodieva, T. 2014. Dairy Business the Case of Bulgarian Dairy Cattle Farmers. Sci. Pap. Ser. Manag. 14:95–102.
Herrero, M., D. Grace, J. Njuki, N. Johnson, D. Enahoro, S. Silvestri, and M. C. Rufino. 2013. The roles of livestock in developing countries. Animal. 7:3–18. doi:10.1017/S1751731112001954.
Hogg, M. A., Z. P. Hohmann, and J. E. Rivera. 2009. Teaching and Learning Guide for: Why Do People Join Groups? Three Motivational Accounts from Social Psychology. Soc. Personal. Psychol. Compass. 3:111–117. doi:10.1111/j.1751-9004.2008.00157.x.
Holmes, J. G. 2000. Social relationships: The nature and function of relational schemas. Eur. J. Soc. Psychol. 30:447–495. doi:10.1002/1099-0992(200007/08)30:4<447::AID-EJSP10>3.0.CO;2-Q.
Horowitz, L. M., K. R. Wilson, B. Turan, P. Zolotsev, M. J. Constantino, L. Henderson, L. M. Horowitz, K. R. Wilson, B. Turan, P. Zolotsev, M. J. Constantino, and L. Henderson. 2006. How Interpersonal Motives Clarify the Meaning of Interpersonal Behavior: A Revised Circumplex Model. Personal. Soc. Psychol. Rev. 10:67–86. doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr1001.
Rahmadanih, S. Bulkis, M. Arsyad, A. Amrullah, and N. M. Viantika. 2018. Role of farmer group institutions in increasing farm production and household food security. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 157. doi:10.1088/1755-1315/157/1/012062.
Richter, E., R. Lazarides, and D. Richter. 2021. Four reasons for becoming a teacher educator : A large-scale study on teacher educators ’ motives and well-being. Teach. Teach. Educ. 103322. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2021.103322. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2021.103322
Taherdoost, H. 2018. Sampling Methods in Research Methodology; How to Choose a Sampling Technique for Research. SSRN Electron. J. doi:10.2139/ssrn.3205035.
Tolno, E., H. Kobayashi, M. Ichizen, M. Esham, and B. S. Balde. 2015. Economic Analysis of the Role of Farmer Organizations in Enhancing Smallholder Potato Farmers’ Income in Middle Guinea. J. Agric. Sci. 7:123–137. doi:10.5539/jas.v7n3p123.
Truong, L., Ho N N, Tran D T, and Nguyen X T. 2020. Does cattle production contribute to improving welfare of poor ethnic minority households in Central Vietnam. Livest. Res. Rural Dev. 32:161.
Vik, J., and E. P. Stræte. 2017. Embedded Competence: A Study of Farmers’ Relation to Competence and Knowledge. Proc. Food Syst. Dyn. 0:392–403. doi:10.18461/pfsd.2017.1740.
Wilson, P. 2014. Farmer characteristics associated with improved and high farm business performance. Int. J. Agric. Manag. 3:1–9. doi:10.5836/ijam/2014-04-02.